![]() Once downloaded, extract the file and save the geckodriver.exe file to the /usr/local/bin location. Then click on the link corresponding to Mac OS. In the Supported platforms page, click on geckodriver releases link. Click on the Documentation link below Firefox. Visit the link − and go to the Browser segment. Syntax WebDriver driver=new FirefoxDriver() We shall be able to launch the browser only after creating an object of the FirefoxDriver class. For Firefox versions which are greater than 47, the geckodriver.exe file is to be used. Something that I want to test - when it becomes available - is the Orion Browser ( ).We can get Firefox working with Selenium webdriver on Mac OS. Maybe things would level up a bit since Chromium and Firefox would get lighter pages with less ads and javascript? since Safari extensions can't block as much crap as Chromium and Firefox extensions can, it would be interesting to see the differences on all 3 browsers with a good adblocker. A lot is being fixed, but there's still a lot of old code, UI's, etc, and while extensions can be more powerful on Firefox, it's not the most polished browser available for this platform. Until last year it would cut my battery life in half when compared to Chromium. Firefox has improved a lot over the past 2 years, but it was neglected on macOS for years. it's a bit too limited (I really need extensions).įor me, between Chromium and Firefox, Chromium-based browsers perform better on macOS. I don't use Safari because it's only available for Apple and to be honest. I use Brave as a "Chrome without Google" (no crypto stuff enabled) as main browser and Firefox (where extensions like uBlock Origin run very well) as secondary. But they also end up using less power than other browsers :P I guess one can say that they're "cheating" by degrading the experience a bit. I know Chromium started doing the same and apparently Firefox does it too, but I remember reading something about Chromium being less restrictive than Safari. Firefox or Chromium will still get the smaller VP9 or AV1 file, probably with a higher resolution, that uses the less efficient software decoding and is heavier on the CPU.Īnother thing that Safari used to do way harder than Chrome and Firefox was background tab throttling. In any case, there are a few things Safari does that will give it an "edge".įor example, if you have the battery setting optimise video streaming enabled, Safari will often get a H.264 file (sometimes with a lower resolution) that uses very efficient hardware decoding. I only received my M1 Max MBP last week and don't know if anything has changed. ![]() I was reporting my own experience with Intel Macs, but there are many articles online about this (some also say the contrary.). If Safari is good enough for you and you don't need cross platform support, then stick with it.ĭo you have any articles or numbers backing the battery life statements? ![]() I also use extensions like uBlock Origin, which can't run on Safari. I use macOS, Android, and Windows, so independently of how good Safari might be for someone that spends a lot of time away from a charger, it's not the best browser for me. With my usage, performance is better on Chrome, battery life is similar to Chrome and not as good as Safari, and like Safari, you may find the odd site that doesn't work well with it. Performance on macOS might be a bit worse than Safari and will use more power.įirefox is between Safari and Chrome in terms of extension support and probably the best option for privacy. Extension support is bad compared to Firefox or Chrome and since most sites are made for Chrome these days, you may find a site or two where not everything works well.Ĭhrome has more extensions, better site compatibility and better security, but isn't good for privacy. Safari has the best integration with Apple products and the best battery life. It depends a lot on how you use your browser.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |